Jeffrey Lord–Super Genius

I was apprehensive at first, considering the title, but Jeffrey Lord hit the nail on the head.

His column at The American Spectator, is a great read and I am glad I clicked on it despite the title.

But like Ted Kennedy, Sarah Palin has a gift. An ability to make Americans focus on the issue of the day — and likewise the head of the table ability to lead the country in a specific direction. In fact, she just did it on health care, making her sentiments plain with a Kennedy-style “Robert Bork’s America” pronouncement. No other losing vice-presidential candidate in American history has drawn this kind of attention — whether the passionate applause or the enraged disdain — as Sarah Palin.

“Did you hear what Sarah Palin said today?”


September 1, 2009 Posted by | conservatives, Jeffrey Lord, Sarah Palin | , , | Leave a comment

In Her Own Words

I found this link on the Drudge Report and Andrew Breitbart Presents Big Hollywood blog.  It is an interview by John Ziegler.

January 9, 2009 Posted by | Sarah Palin | Leave a comment

Dear Peggy Noonan

While taking a tiny break from having fun with my family, I ran across your article in the Wall Street Journal entitled Palin’s Failin’. It so happens that I have always admired you, your beauty, your mind, and eloquence. I have to tell you in this very public way how disappointed I am with your recent conclusions.

More than ever on the campaign trail, the candidates are dropping their G’s. Hardworkin’ families are strainin’ and tryin’a get ahead.

Now what are you tryin’ to say? Seriously, Peggy, (can I call you Peggy?) Are you saying that Sarah Palin’s honest-to-goodness regular American way of speaking is somehow dumbing down politics? Because if that is the proper interpretation of your mentioning this in your piece, it is ridiculous. I mean, please, Joe Biden is dumbing down the political discussion, and Barack is as uh, uh, um, uh, ah, stupid as they come.

All of the candidates say “mom and dad”: “our moms and dads who are struggling.” This is Mr. Bush’s former communications adviser Karen Hughes’s contribution to our democratic life, that you cannot speak like an adult in politics now, that’s too austere and detached, snobby. No one can say mothers and fathers, it’s all now the faux down-home, patronizing—and infantilizing—moms and dads. Do politicians ever remember that in a nation obsessed with politics, our children—sorry, our kids—look to political figures for a model as to how adults sound?

Look, Peggy, I have a mom and dad my kids do too. I would never think of making fun of people who do not call their mother and father ‘mom and dad’ yet you seem to think that people who say these things don’t have the capacity to be conservative or even read the Wall Street Journal. Beyond that, the part of this quote that really got me going was your use of these particular words, “faux, down-home, patronizing and infantilizing.” That will be about enough from you. If you can’t understand how many people in this great nation have moms and dads and learn the American way of life from them, you are out of your mind. It seems like you would rather keep politics to the elite, highly “educated” (I put quotes on educated because there is more than one way to get an education.) But you can’t have it your way. Do you want conservatism to prosper? I thought you’ve been trying to do that all these years and it is, just not in your circles. The fact is, Peggy, that you need our help. If you don’t want our help, keep writing crap like this, and we’ll take over.

Now, let’s talk about how our kids look up to political figures.  Do you not see the positive effect a woman like Sarah Palin will have on our daughters?  How the personal responsibility has deteriorated surrounding the Clinton Presidency?  How sexual promiscuity has increased amongst our children, not to mention the ‘get used’ mentality that Hillary Clinton has championed?  How our sons will have to opportunity to understand how to be a manly man and still care for your family by knowing Todd Palin? Your focus on how she speaks is at best, narrow-minded.

In the past two weeks she has spent her time throwing out tinny lines to crowds she doesn’t, really, understand.

Not like you, right? Do you even know how stupid that statement is? Have you seen her crowds? Have you heard their cheers? Have you seen the ball caps and jeans and t-shirts?

This is not a leader, this is a follower, and she follows what she imagines is the base, which is in fact a vast and broken-hearted thing whose pain she cannot, actually, imagine.

This line has such poetic beauty, “…a vast and broken-hearted thing…” Here’s my question, who has broken the republican base? You may point to George Bush for his lack of leadership and in many cases, lack of conservatism. That does make a bit of sense. A few months ago, I agreed with you. But, right now, this minute, it is people like you. You come off as someone who hasn’t time to get to know her housekeeper, when it could be your housekeeper who lives life day by day as a dyed-in-the-wool conservative. Her natural God-given talent for noticing tiny details when polishing silver carries over to her love of keeping on top of politics. Perhaps in her spare time she reads books about the founding of our nation, about foreign policy, about political theory.  Then you threw in “she cannot actually imagine.” Well sure, people who drop their G’s and have moms and dads lack imagination.

She could reinspire and reinspirit; she chooses merely to excite. She doesn’t seem to understand the implications of her own thoughts.

Yup, they lack imagination and when they do manage to think, they don’t often understand what they are thinking. Are you serious?

No news conferences? Interviews now only with friendly journalists? You can’t be president or vice president and govern in that style, as a sequestered figure.

Hey, tell that to Obama.

This has been Mr. Bush’s style the past few years, and see where it got us.

That’s President Bush, Miss Noonan.

You must address America in its entirety, not as a sliver or a series of slivers but as a full and whole entity, a great nation trying to hold together. When you don’t, when you play only to your little piece, you contribute to its fracturing.

Again, tell that to Obama.

In the end the Palin candidacy is a symptom and expression of a new vulgarization in American politics. It’s no good, not for conservatism and not for the country. And yes, it is a mark against John McCain, against his judgment and idealism.

Your intolerance of everyday American people is what’s vulgar, Peggy.

At any rate, come and get me, copper.

Look, Peggy, like I said, I have always admired you, that’s the truth. I am a Republican because it is the home of conservatism. John McCain is not a conservative. Sarah Palin is a conservative. I am only voting for McCain because he has picked Governor Palin. I know there are many people in this nation like me. But hey, if you don’t want my help in your quest of defining conservatism, so be it. But let me say this, if you intend to keep bashing fellow conservatives you will lose your credibility.

But what do I know, I’m just a seamstress.

October 19, 2008 Posted by | common sense, Peggy Noonan, Sarah Palin | 2 Comments

Liberal Feminism Has Created Superwoman

We’ve all heard stories of how the liberal jewel that is feminism just does not work out. After 30 odd years of telling women they can have it all, the liberal female story is still the same. According to the left there is still not equal pay for equal work, women may be able to tap the glass ceiling, but they will not be able to reach the top. The Democrat Party has taken the party nomination of the one easily identifiable woman in recent history, and then decided she wasn’t even qualified enough for Vice President. Sort of patted her on the back, and said, “nice try hon.”

Fear and insecurity has taken down many women. Why? Because the liberal version of feminism does not work in both a physical nature, and quite literally.

The liberal version of feminism forced women to work in a role that is not natural. It told women that men aren‘t useful, children were nuisances. Basically telling a woman that she can do everything a man can do, in fact she could wield the power that men do. Along the line, liberal feminists championed abortion, and flooded the courts, media and public school education with stories of how poor girls were getting raped by their fathers all across the land, and they had no other recourse. Media stories told young girls that since an aborted fetus is not a real baby, just a tissue mass, that a girl mustn’t feel guilt, it was never alive. Except that it was, and she would, because that’s natural.

The liberal version of feminism rewarded the lazy. It taught self-centered egotism instead of confidence. That if a girl only had enough self-esteem that she could do anything she wanted. That teaching was advanced by creating the illusion that women were minorities and so the movement went to work to lower the standards of nearly every task of accomplishment. Making victims of every woman that followed it.

But somewhere on the outskirts of town, women kept on trying. These women with strong grips on the idea that they can have it all, worked at it. These women with strong men in their lives making them know that they could do anything they wanted to, and do it well. These women with strong family ties and an understanding of real life in America. These women that learned quickly that the world does not care a sniff about their “self-esteem.” These women that allowed instinct to take over and to produce children in a loving atmosphere, and to do everything, even give up everything for that child to be better than they. These are women who would never take a handout from their family, friends, and especially the government.

These women are not the minority. It is finally being realized that women are the majority, and that the majority of women work A LOT.

Nearly every mother I know works at a job or owns a business, has children, a husband, a home, is a member of at least one service organization, manages the family’s finances, makes calls for the family’s health appointments, takes their children to whatever sport or club they are in after school, provides three meals for the family, organizes the home, does the laundry, washes the dishes and does her best to keep the whole family smiling.

How about a woman who does all that, owns guns, loves her country, goes to church on Sunday, and melts when she sees a baby. I know many of them.

How about a woman who does all that, snowmobiles, hunts, fishes, and can’t wait to hear what her husband has to say. I know quite a few of them.

How about a woman who does all these things, and has learned about life by living it.


There she is, Superwoman.

September 8, 2008 Posted by | Sarah Palin | 2 Comments