Increase in Population, Bad for Democrats
The United States Speaker of the House, third in line to the Presidency had this exchange with George Stephanopoulos yesterday on ABC’s This Week, about President Obama’s stimulus proposal.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?
PELOSI (D): Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?
PELOSI (D): No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.
The question from Stephanopoulos apparently was referring to a statement made by House Minority Leader John Boehner (R), “At the end of the day, government can’t solve this problem, the American people have to solve it. And the way they can solve it is if we allow them to keep more of the money that they earn.”
“How you can spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives?” he asked. “How does that stimulate the economy?”
Well, well, well, is The Speaker of the House saying that we are to stop having children in order to meet the goals of State Budgets? Hmmmm.
I wonder if Jennifer Granholm (D) Michigan Governor, presiding over the worst economic downturn in State history feels the same way? What about Bart Stupak (D)? Does Bart Stupak (D) feel that children are too overwhelming a cost for the States to deal with? What are the thoughts on this issue from Carl Levin (D), Debbie Stabenow (D), Andy Newman (D) hmmmm???
I’m telling you what, friend Democrats, you have no idea how extreme your Democrat party has become, and I am here to highlight it for you.
No comments yet.